Chairman Romeo de Bellefroid opened the evening on behalf of the “Vrij Onderzoek” and outlined the framework for the debate. It came as no surprise that VO took the initiative for this sensitive debate. As a student study group they encourage open discussion at our university and partake in it, using as starting point the principle of free inquiry, with no confrontation or obstacles on the way. Last week they did not even hesitate to bring Michel Vandenbosch of GAIA to the VUB.
 
After the speech by VO all parties mentioned in the article were given the opportunity to present their views on the matter: De Moeial as well as student associations Solvay and MesaCosa. Subsequently, the debate opened with interventions from the audience. Everyone was given the chance to respond to five questions by the moderator Otto Cartrysse who incidentally did an excellent job in leading the public forum.
 
RESPECT FOR OUR STUDENTS
This article does not in any way commit to taking on a debate that belongs to the students themselves. What remains a fact is that a debate was conducted and that many students participated in it. Those who felt targeted had the chance to defend themselves. Moreover, an important theme was effectively addressed from different angles.
 
Sexism is a reality in our society. Believing the VUB would be exempt from it entirely is naive and hypocritical. The university can take on a pioneering role by reflecting on the topic, they can talk about it openly or choose to take internal action. The events of the past few days provide plenty of food for thought for everyone involved, they are more than simply a core of the debate. The essence is that the students themselves have taken the initiative to come together in an auditorium, and to engage in an open debate.
 
The VUB can be proud of its students who have dared to come together and step out of their comfort zone to expose and treat such a critical yet taboo topic; who have dared to write about a sensitive subject; and who have taken on the burden to defend their university’s values, folklore and name.
 
Most importantly, after the storm is over the debate on sexism should continue. Both at the university and elsewhere in society.